Built for parents and educators deciding if this is the right fit — not just a summary, the actual expectations for each stage.
No technical vocabulary required going in. Every term is explained in plain language before it's ever used on its own. The goal here is curiosity and confidence, not competence — your student should finish this stage wanting to know more, not overwhelmed.
Real terminology starts here, but every term still gets the same treatment: plain explanation first, then the technical name, then a real example. Your student starts working with actual free-tier tools instead of simulations — this is where "capable" starts to mean something concrete.
This stage speaks the same language the professional tracks do. Your student won't leave this stage locked into one path — they'll get a real, light taste of all five technical tracks and decide for themselves which one earned their interest, rather than being funneled into a single direction.
A good fit if: your student is curious about technology, you want a structured path rather than scattered YouTube tutorials, and you're comfortable with them working at their own pace across stages.
Probably not the right fit yet if: your student needs one-on-one live instruction to stay engaged, or you're looking for a fast credential rather than a real foundation — Compass is built for depth over speed.
Every stage ends somewhere specific. After Stage Three, your student chooses: technical depth in whichever FHG University track pulled them in, or the identity and ownership-mindset work in FHG Foundations first. Neither is forced — it's their call, informed by what actually interested them.